The ‘Faith or Works’ debate bores me

faithIt’s hard to believe that it is so, but there are in fact still Christians who get steamed up about the question of whether we are saved by faith or works.

This, for those who may be unaware of it, was a major issue during the 16th Century Reformation. Broadly speaking, the view of the Catholic Church at the time was that we are saved by both faith and good works (‘faith without works is dead’ – James 2:17). On the other hand, the Protestant Reformers taught that good works, while important, are not part of our salvation (which they interpreted to mean the question of whether or not we will go to heaven when we die); thus they were ‘faith alone’ churches (‘For we maintain that a person is justified by faith apart from the works of the law’ – Romans 3:28).

Now, I personally have a sneaking suspicion that both the Catholic Church and the Reformers may have misunderstood what Paul and James were on about (and I think Tom Wright has done a great job in explaining what the NT authors actually meant by faith and works). But there’s another, very practical reason why I’m bored by the debate about faith and works. Here it is.

I don’t know a single Protestant or Evangelical theologian who doesn’t think it’s important for Christians to obey God’s commands and live a Christlike life. They all agree with that. The slogan I learned in college was ‘We are justified by faith alone, but the faith that justifies is never alone’. Huh? What sort of sophistry is that? Are Christians called to obey Jesus, or not? Apparently he thought we were! “Everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock” (Matthew 7:24). If you believe and trust in your doctor then you put her instructions into practice. If you don’t you obviously don’t believe in her. So – whatever they say they believe about faith and works, all evangelical and Protestant theologians actually agree that it is important for us to keep God’s commandments, and that if we don’t, our faith is probably not real. So – isn’t this ‘salvation by faith and works?’

On the other hand, when push comes to shove, I don’t know a single Catholic theologian who would deny the idea that God’s love for us is unconditional – that is to say, when we turn to God in repentance and faith and ask for forgiveness, he doesn’t ask “Do you deserve it?” or ‘Have you earned it?”, but simply pours out his love and forgiveness on us as a free gift, not because we are loveable but because God is love. Furthermore, I’m absolutely sure that every major Catholic theologian today would agree that when we stand before the face of God, we will do so as sinners needing God’s forgiveness; none of us will be able to say “I deserve eternal life, Lord: just look at all the good deeds I’ve done!”

No: Catholics and Protestants alike agree that God’s grace (his unconditional love and generosity, continually poured out on the world and seen above all in the Cross of Jesus) is the source of all genuine Christian experience. Catholics and Protestants alike would agree that we are called to turn from our previous allegiances, put our faith in Jesus as our Saviour and Lord, and learn to follow him in our daily lives. Catholics and Protestants alike would agree that all who profess faith in Christ are called to learn to obey God’s commands and become more and more Christ-like, as the Holy Spirit works in them to transform them into the likeness of Jesus.

So isn’t this enough? Why are people still arguing about faith and works? Ordinary Christians, I think, understand instinctively that they go together. That’s what I believe, and that’s why I’ve lost interest in the whole argument. In an increasingly secular world where there is so much suffering and so much unbelief, it seems to me that we’ve got more important fish to fry.


6 thoughts on “The ‘Faith or Works’ debate bores me

  1. Pingback: The 'Faith or Works' debate bores me | Faith, Folk and Charity - Christian IBD

  2. I think people are still arguing about it because 1) “grace” is so important – and so intriguingly strange! – a part of the parables in particular and 2) because the controversy gets at some of the deep and real issues of human psychology. I think the most important thing about Lutheran thought is precisely that it’s psychological, rather than moralistic. The church has a tendency to scold all the time; this is its primary voice in the public square, and has been for a long time as far as I can tell. This is exactly why people are bored with, and leaving, it, today, I think.

    To me, “grace” is a welcome corrective to the extremely deep-seated human (and thus, churchly) tendency to self- (and works-) righteousness – and it’s at the heart of Christian faith in a way that it’s not in any other human endeavor that I’m aware of. Grace is actually a really interesting topic. And needs more emphasis, too, exactly because it’s not the way human beings naturally think.. Grace is, after all, what makes “the Gospel” what it is, and different from anything else – at least, that’s how I see it. I’m not surprised people argue about this.

    I agree, though, that people can get too worked up over the whole thing – and probably the conversation should actually go in a different direction at this point. But the endless moralism I’ve seen in the church is always centered in “works” – so I’m quite happy to see even an overemphasis on “grace.”

  3. Tim Chesterton

    Barbara, I’m not talking about endless moralism, I’m talking about obedience to Jesus. I’m talking about what Jesus meant when he said, “let your light so shine before others that they may see your good works and glorify your Father in heaven”.

  4. All I can say is: I’ve been moralized at pretty consistently for the entire time I’ve been around the church – about 10 years now. The problem is that almost any Bible passage you can come up with can be – and is – interpreted in dozens of different (often mutually-exclusive) ways. (For instance, I don’t see the passage you cite as a command requiring obedience.)

    By contrast: nobody can moralize about “grace.” Grace is God’s free gift – and completely out of our hands. As in the parable of the vineyard workers, who gets what is entirely up to God; what human beings think about the matter is entirely irrelevant. That is the only possible hope for people considered beyond the pale (for the present moment, at least, as this is always changing). It’s the only possible hope for everybody else, too – the only hope of dropping their ideas about “how things are supposed to be.” Another example of this is the parable of the publican and the Pharisee.

    I’m not arguing against “good works,” BTW. I’m saying that Christ is Grace in himself, asking only for our love – and, thanks be to God, offering us the chance to become something better than we are by his love and forgiveness. And that THAT’s an idea you find almost nowhere else in the world….

  5. Steve London

    Of course, I feel the same way about the whole Calvinism vs. Arminianism debate. Enough already!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.